Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wehmeyer L
Schüller T
Kiess J
Heiden P
Visser-Vandewalle V
Baldermann JC
Andrade P
Scientific Abstract

Extended research has pointed to the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). The four most commonly used DBS targets for TS include the centromedian nucleus-nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi) and the centromedian nucleus-parafascicular (CM-Pf) complexes of the thalamus, and the posteroventrolateral (pvIGPi) and the anteromedial portion of the globus pallidus internus (amGPi). Differences and commonalities between those targets need to be compared systematically. Therefore, we evaluated whether DBS is effective in reducing TS symptoms and target-specific differences. A PubMed literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible literature was used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. In total, 65 studies with 376 patients were included. Overall, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores were reduced by more than 50 in 69% of the patients. DBS also resulted in significant reductions of secondary outcome measures, including the total YGTSS, modified Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale (mRVRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and Becks Depression Inventory (BDI). All targets resulted in significant reductions of YGTSS scores and, with the exception of the CM-Pf, also in reduced YBOCS scores. Interestingly, DBS of pallidal targets showed increased YGTSS and YBOCS reductions compared to thalamic targets. Also, the meta-analysis including six randomized controlled and double-blinded trials demonstrated clinical efficacy of DBS for TS, that remained significant for GPi but not thalamic stimulation in two separate meta-analyses. We conclude that DBS is a clinically effective treatment option for patients with treatment-refractory TS, with all targets showing comparable improvement rates. Future research might focus on personalized and symptom-specific target selection.

Citation

2021. Front Neurol, 12:769275.

DOI
10.3389/fneur.2021.769275
Related Content
Publication
Piña-Fuentes D, van Dijk JMC, van Zijl JC, Moes HR, van Laar T, Oterdoom DLM, Little S, Brown P, Beudel M
2020. Brain Stimul., 13(6):1507-1516.
Publication
Cagnan H, Pedrosa D, Little S, Pogosyan A, Cheeran B, Aziz TZ, Green AL, Fitzgerald J, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Zrinzo L, Hariz M, Friston KJ, Denison T, Brown P
2017. Brain, 140(1):132-145.
Publication
Weerasinghe G, Duchet B, Cagnan H, Brown P, Bick C, Bogacz R
2019. PLoS Comput. Biol., 15(8):e1006575.
Publication
Little S, Tripoliti E, Beudel M, Pogosyan A, Cagnan H, Herz DM, Bestmann S, Aziz TZ, Cheeran B, Zrinzo L, Hariz M, Hyam J, Limousin P, Foltynie T, Brown P
2016.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 87(12):1388-1389.
Publication
Cagnan H, Denison T, McIntyre C, Brown P
2019. Nat. Biotechnol., 37(9):1024-1033.